Personal Loans | Music Festival | News | Pay Day Loans | Personal Loans
Should Liverpool Re-sign Harry Kewell? [Archive] - Soccer Fans Network Forums

View Full Version : Should Liverpool Re-sign Harry Kewell?


The Reds 2008
01-23-2008, 09:06 AM
I really hope they do sign him he has had alot of trouble since he moved to anfield with injury problems.

Harry has been playing around 70 mins in a game as late but really hasn't been doing all that well i have heard alot of people saying that liverpool should not sign him and things like that but i think we should give him a chance to get back to his best. We will have to wait till the end of this season and next for him to get fully bak to normal. Also a goal would give him a massive boost in confidence. So what do u think do we wait for Harry and re-sign him or let him go?

Nit
01-23-2008, 10:09 AM
no they shouldn't for the reason that he is not up to liverpool standard anymore. He has been poor since returning from injury and all the fair that rafa put in him doesn't seem to be there.

LIVERPOOL MUST GET RID OF THE DEADWOOD!!!!

Banlegendfjh
01-23-2008, 10:16 AM
no they shouldn't for the reason that he is not up to liverpool standard anymore. He has been poor since returning from injury and all the fair that rafa put in him doesn't seem to be there.

LIVERPOOL MUST GET RID OF THE DEADWOOD!!!!

I think that is a bit harsh. He has done ok whenver I have watched him.

holicman
01-23-2008, 01:57 PM
Simple answer is NO.

Who should they get to replace him though ?

Gunner
01-23-2008, 02:09 PM
he could stay, but if he doesnt its not a great loss..

FootballSpy007
01-23-2008, 03:05 PM
Harry Kewell is past his best. He doesn't deserve a second chance at Liverpool. I think he should sign with a club like Newcastle United. Let them have another one of the big fours castoffs.

Nit
01-24-2008, 12:30 PM
but for a club like the reds, they deserve better players,
selll the players like
kuyt
riise
voronin
sissoko etc..

and as for a replacement..we will take mancini or quaresma i don't mind, but with gillet and hicks in charge i think that someone decent would be good enough

nb-legenda
01-25-2008, 02:53 PM
but for a club like the reds, they deserve better players,
selll the players like
kuyt
riise
voronin
sissoko etc..

and as for a replacement..we will take mancini or quaresma i don't mind, but with gillet and hicks in charge i think that someone decent would be good enough

Riise wasn't bad last year but he lost his form drastically and is too selfish. Kuyt, Sissoko, and Voronin are getting in my nerves, they are not team players, especially Kuyt who has a bad disciplinary record.

Nit
01-31-2008, 09:41 AM
Well sissoko just got sold to juve, pretty much a cover up as we needed money to sign for mascherano
one down, many more to go

holicman
01-31-2008, 02:51 PM
Why do we even have Mascherano ????

What has he done since joining ???

BRISTOLUK
01-31-2008, 05:06 PM
Harry Kewell is past his best. He doesn't deserve a second chance at Liverpool.

I thought he'd had 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th chances.

I see Wayne Routledge is off to Villa for £2m. He is one of many players from the England under 21s with much potential.

But no matter who the players are, Rafa is mucking around with them far too much. Rotating is one thing, but you need to have systems and partnerships established first.

Ranieri was thought to be among the first, if not the first to tinker...but Ferguson was doing it at ManU before him. Remember when he'd leave out Cole and Yorke? That pair was rested but the team balance wasn't worsened.

Even now he doesn't muck around with the defence. It's a foundation for them to rely on no matter which of the other 10 or 11 fill the remaining 6 places.

Wenger makes changes, but Arsenal pretty much has a first eleven and then 'reserves' for the cups or lesser opponents. But all of his teams have their 'units' so they play the same game, whearas Rafa just seems to make random 'individual' changes as if he's still looking for a good balance.