View Full Version : Park Ji Sung and Nakata
only123123
12-04-2006, 01:31 PM
Which of the two are better?
Though Nakata retired, still he is the hero of Japanese football.
Park is playing in Man U while Nakata played in AS Roma.
Who should be more respected between the two?
emode
12-07-2006, 03:30 AM
Between the two Nakata of course b/c he has been a lot longer player than Ji Sung so he deserved much more respect!!!
What has Park done other than prove he can play Man U bench and be happy?
Nakata
emode
12-07-2006, 03:53 AM
What has Park done other than prove he can play Man U bench and be happy?
Nakata
:lol: the only reason he's on bench is b/c of ankle injury!! He's probably not happy at all but still w/o doubt nakata is better.
Sunny Hwang
12-07-2006, 04:11 AM
I have no idea why people think park was on the bench all the time.
He started many games last season, which by the way was his very first year with MAN U, and proved himself as a vital part of the team everytime he was on the field.. it's a pity that he got injured early this season but i believe he'll be showing us what he is capable of when he comes back soon.
i'm not trying to play down Nakata's great career, which i really respect.
but i think Park deserves more credit.
Both Park and Nakata must be great players from asia.
I did not know of his injury, but I did see him play a few times last season and it was short of spectacular.
judicatormd
12-09-2006, 06:54 AM
I did not know of his injury, but I did see him play a few times last season and it was short of spectacular.
yeah you obviously don't even watch EPL. Seriously how often or frequently do you watch the games? how closely do you follow EPL? If you don't know please ask for clarification instead of making false claims on how Park is a bench warmer etc... ok?!?!
vBulletin® v3.7.0 Beta 3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.