View Full Version : Bosnian History
Saraj Fanático
03-23-2006, 02:18 AM
This is an excellent page to explain the history of Bosnia. Or Bosniak's. This page will explain and answer all the question's of the Bosniak history. It proves stupidiy wrong such as Bosnian's once being Serb's or Croat's or whatever idiot's claim we where these day's. :rolleyes:
http://members.tripod.com/worldupdates/islamintheworld/id23.htm
Fuςion
03-23-2006, 02:24 AM
You are very stupid, you deserve a warning for posting after the other thread was closed and close this thread.
Saraj Fanático
03-23-2006, 02:35 AM
You are very stupid, you deserve a warning for posting after the other thread was closed and close this thread.
It is stupidity that closes thread's. The stupidity of those who claim Bogomil's once magically took up christianity and then converted again. Give me a break. :rolleyes:
I made this thread for Bosnian's not Serb's or Croat's. So why does it bother you?
Panathinaikos2
03-23-2006, 02:44 AM
editted..
Fuςion
03-23-2006, 03:47 AM
It is stupidity that closes thread's. The stupidity of those who claim Bogomil's once magically took up christianity and then converted again. Give me a break. :rolleyes:
I made this thread for Bosnian's not Serb's or Croat's. So why does it bother you?
I'm more Bosnian than your bitch ass ever will be. This is a soccer forum and thats how it should be and as mods we have to close all away from soccer threads, I do my job right and I want others to prevent this forum from dying.
seems like im speaking to ten years old here:
1.bogomil is a religion/sect originated from bulgaria
2.it is a heretical from of christianity,not islam.
3.most importantly, it was created in 954 AD. Croats and Serbs arrived in the balkans in the 600's, so you just shot yourself in the foot.
1. This infomation is a first for me,and probably to many others.
2. Make a choice, you present 2 VERY different ideas here:
Were they there first as natives of the land, if so provide evidence as no hisotrical sources say they are decendents of illyarians but are infact SLAVS.
or
Did they arrive in bosnia, with the already the pre-conceived name bosniak...amazing yet imposible. If so, when did a so called bosniak tribe arive in bosnia?
You contradict yourself here,
"always will be and always were, yet under a different name",hmmm makes real sense.
So bosniaks ( who were once known as the illyrians ) as you claim, are the aboriginals(native people) of the balkans, who never migrated but were always there....? If so, evidence.
Can you provide me with some evidence with the struggle, uprisings, civil disorder or wars, that the native bosniak people were subjected to while under the "rule" of the "foreign" Croatian and Serbian kings such as Tomislav or Mihailo?
I will adress each part separatly, although i dont know what exactly you are trying to prove with this, however:
1.The province of Bosnia was much smaller, then what is today consider the borders of the province of Bosnia
Eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rastbosne.png
2.Yes the Kingdom of Croatia did under Tomislav(926 AD)rule over historical provinces (e.g., Hum, Vrhbosna, Podrinje, etc.) aswell as historical bosna i.e http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rastbosne.png, and even extend across what is even considered Todays Bosnia-Herzegovina, even across the river Drina.
3.Evidence, Tomislav was crowned in Duvno Field(Tomislavgrad) in todays Bosnia-Herzegovina.
4. Yes some sources suggest Croats originated from Persia(Iran) and
5. From your two links you added, it states croats arrived in the Balkans over 3000 years ago, so i dont know where you are going with this??
6.Unless you can provide me with eveidence that Bosniak tribe arrived even earlier then this date, or that the bosniaks have some sort of relation to the native inhabitants of the balkans, the illyrians inorder to justify your point.
7.If you posted those links inorder to prove that there is a distinction between Serbs and Croats, i thank you.
Again you shoot yourself in the foot, If as you claim Bosniaks were Bogomils(which in anycase is a religion not a people), as that was developed in 950's and Croats arrived in the balkans from iran in the 600's, and according to your sources, over 3000 years ago.
Again and again you contradict yourself, claiming to be Bogomils, then claiming to be Illyrians, then claiming to be Slavs.
So who are you trying to prove is wrong, my guess is you.
read it^^^^
boris4c
03-23-2006, 04:22 AM
ok first of all i have to say to fc sarajevo that there is no ***kin apostrophe when u wanna say something in plural.. its not serb's its serbs, it's not croat's its croats, its not bosnian's its bosnians.. unless youre talking about something that belongs to someone.. so then it would be with an apostrophe..
and second of all EVERYBODY knows muslims in bosnia are croats or serbs that were forced to convert.. in every book it says it.. it says MUSLIM SLAVS.. anyways..
and here is something kinda outta topic but here it is anyways:
How to Survive 600 Years of Terrorism and 60 Years of Communism
By: Mary Mostert, Analyst, Banner of Liberty (www.bannerofliberty.com)
March 20, 2006
For the past 10 years I have been writing, off and on, about the disintegration of Yugoslavia and that has led to me having a large and growing number of Serb readers. I got interested in the Serb part of the story because I noticed, during the Bosnian war, that CNN never, NOT ONCE, ever had a Serb spokesman on any news program. That struck me as rather odd, since it was the Serbs who were our ONLY allies in the Balkans during World War 1, when approximately half the Serbian male population was killed, and World War II, when, according to the Holocaust Museum, over a million Serbs, Jews and Roma (gypsies) were slaughtered in Croatian concentration camps, such as Jasenovac.
The cruelty of the Ustaše guards horrified even the Germans, who used the more humane killing method of poison gas than was used on the Serbs. After the war German domination was merely traded for Soviet domination. This happened largely because a British double agent fed lies about who was REALLY on the Allied side to Winston Churchill. At Yalta Churchill insisted on the Allies supporting Josip Broz Tito, a communist, in spite of eye-witness accounts by hundreds of American Air Force pilots and crewmen who knew which group was really supporting the Americans and British. When shot down over Yugoslavia during WWII, over 500 American pilots were saved by the Serbs under General Mihailovich.
Muslims ruled the area for more than 600 years under the Ottoman Turkish Empire, while often trying to force the Serbian Orthodox population to convert to Islam. The rulers of the Austrian Empire often tried to force the Serbs to recognize the Pope. Yet, most of the Serbs maintained their loyalty to the Serbian Orthodox Church throughout hundreds of years of persecution, without trying to force others into their religion when they came to power.
In 1996, the latest chapter in the misinformation about Serbs was being written when President Bill Clinton, OK'ed Terrorist Financed Weapons to Bosnia Muslims. Our media was bombarding us with stories about how the Serbs were killing Albanians – but never told the Americans that the Kosovo Liberation Army, (KLA) until 1998 when Clinton took it off, was on the U.S. State Department list of the major terrorist organizations in the world.
By 1999, the KLA, which was trained and armed by Iran and Osama bin Laden was the source of the stories that Milosevic, and the Serbs, were committing genocide. Also the Albanian lobby in Washington, which appears to have been financed largely by the drug trade in Kosovo and some wealthy Albanian-Americans, was circulating false stories to the media about the „Serbs killing 100,000” Albanians in Kosovo. Based on those reports, American airplanes bombed Belgrade and Kosovo for 78 days.
After the bombing, scores of forensic experts were sent to Kosovo to unearth mass graves containing the bodies of those 100,000 to 200,000 Albanians were buried in. No mass graves were found. The leader of the Spanish forensic team reported after a thorough investigation: „I calculate that the final figure of dead in Kosovo will be 2,500 at the most, including lots of strange deaths that can't be blamed on anyone.”
Yet, with the death of Slobodan Milosevic we still are getting cartoons and stories about the „200,000 people” that Milosevic supposedly killed. Only - no one could find the bodies. On the other hand, in Iraq, where the media never even TALKED about genocide, so far 300,000 bodies HAVE been found in mass graves. Meanwhile the media tells us Saddam Hussein wasn't all that bad because he didn’t have „weapons of mass destruction” and the Democrats want to impeach President Bush because there was no reason to invade Iraq. It was a good thing that we bombed Belgrade for 78 days over 2500 deaths but 300,000 bodies in mass graves in Iraq is no big deal?
In ten years of communicating with Serbs from all over the world, I have often tried to get them to give me more background to try to figure out how they have managed to hold fast to their faith during 600 years of Muslim persecution, the Holocaust and 60 years of Communism. Most of them seem puzzled by my questions. But, from their answers it appears that their faith in both their God and their nation has been nurtured and has survived within their strong family units, in SPITE of what was happening in their country. Except for a brief period of time between the fall of Turkish domination and the rise of communism, they have never lived in a nation that had freedom of religion. Yet, their churches and their faith have survived.
Finally, this week, following the death of their last communist president, Slobodan Milosevic, one of my readers, Alex, who lives in Belgrade, wrote a succinct history of Serb experience in living with terrorism for hundreds of years. In this time of rising worldwide terrorism, this is a story the American people need to hear. Neither Alex or any of the other Serbs I've communicated with in the past 10 years EVER seemed to cast themselves in the role of „victim” which has become so common among minorities and special interest groups in the USA and among Bosnian Muslims and Albanians who have e-mailed me. Yet, no group of Americans or the Albanians and Bosnian Muslims who claim to be „victims” of persecution EVER had to face the kind of persecution the Serbs have experienced, from both radical Muslims and radical Christians, and even from America when we destroyed most of the infrastructure of their country based on misinformation and outright lies. Would we be so calm about it if we lost OUR freedom of religion? Alex wrote:
„Serbs have had plenty of experience in dealing with radical Islam, what Americans now call Islamic Terror. Americans tragically lost some 3,000 lives and several buildings on Sept. 11, and promptly wanted to turn the world upside down and intervene in other countries, in pursuit of justice.
”Yet, the Serbs - who have suffered a million times more, for centuries, have not been allowed to fight the same type of terror in their own country.
„For almost 500 years the Turks had beheaded our best men, raped our prettiest women, taken our male babies and young boys and raised them as Turks - these were the yanissaries, they were even more brutal than the ordinary Turks; taken our girls to the sultan's harem, taken our lands, our harvest, our livestock, our food, burned our churches and turned them into mosques or horse stables, placed our men on sticks so that they die a suffering death...
”To give you an idea of how horrific the Turks were, here is a photo of the Cele-kula located in the southern Serbian city of Nis - Serbia's second biggest city after Belgrade. The Turks had beheaded (decapitated) our men after a battle in 1809, and had made a tower out of 952 of their skulls, as a warning to the Serbs to end their rebellion. Some of the sculls had fallen out over time, but some still remain, to date. This is now a historic, cultural and sacred monument protected by the state, but also a brutal reminder of what Serbia had gone through.
„And, instead of America understanding us and supporting us, what does it do? It punishes us in every way possible and then rewards our enemies - Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo, who have ties with the very Al Qaeda the Americans are fighting. Isn't that a bit strange? Yes, very.
Cele Kula in Nis (pronounced as Chele Kula, Nish)
”Unfortunately, our Catholic and other Christian neighbors did things just as bad as the Islamists. The Croats had performed genocide of Serbs during WW 1, WW 2 (especially WW 2, for example, the death camp at Jasenovac) and again in the 1990s (for example: Operation Storm). Hitler had no better ally, than the Croatian Ustaši. The Hungarians killed us, tortured us, hanged us and mutulated us (in Macva) and placed our people under a freezing river (in the city of Novi Sad, 1942). The Germans had put us in forced labor camps, prisons, death camps, and in front of firing squads (one example: in the city of Kragujevac as many as 7,000 residents were shot in a single day).
„We also suffered greatly under the atheists - communists. It's no secret that Soviet troops had raped many women when they and Tito's partisans liberated Serbia in 1945, only to introduce us to communist terror in which the highest price was paid by Serbs.
”Serbia has had the misfortune to be placed right at the place where Europe meets the Middle East, where two Christian religions clash (Roman Catholic and Orthodox) and where Christianity in general and Islam clash. And we have survived it all, including the betrayal and attacks by what were supposed to be our historical allies.„
Distribute this among your friends and neighbors and especially to your members of Congress. It is time that we begin to learn some of the history of past terrorism experienced by other people and other places. The Serbs have survived – but their numbers have been cut dramatically by hundreds of years of terrorism. When you read media stories about Kosovo being given to the Albanians who lied to America about a ”genocide„ - think about what that would really mean. Do we really want to strip Kosovo, the Serb Jerusalem, from the Serbs and give it to a group of people who have poured into Kosovo, from across the border, and used terrorism to kill or drive out its Serb population over the past 60 years? That seems to be about where the Kosovo talks are headed.
Website: http://www.bannerofliberty.com
To E-Mail Mary Mostert, Analyst - Mary@bannerofliberty.com
herceg_jadran
03-23-2006, 05:16 AM
:rolleyes:
herceg_jadran
03-23-2006, 05:20 AM
read it agin my friend,as your link does not in anyway address the origins of bosniaks
seems like im speaking to ten years old here:
We never came. We were alway's there as Bogomil's
We are not Serb's, Croat's and Slav's. We were Bogomil's who belived in a religion similar to Islam.
1.bogomil is a religion/sect originated from bulgaria
2.it is a heretical from of christianity,not islam.
3.most importantly, it was created in 954 AD. Croats and Serbs arrived in the balkans in the 600's, so you just shot yourself in the foot.
Bosniaks never arrived to bosnia they were allways there, and if they did Bosniaks arrived before.
1. This infomation is a first for me,and probably to many others.
2. Make a choice, you present 2 VERY different ideas here:
Were they there first as natives of the land, if so provide evidence as no hisotrical sources say they are decendents of illyarians but are infact SLAVS.
or
Did they arrive in bosnia, with the already the pre-conceived name bosniak...amazing yet imposible. If so, when did a so called bosniak tribe arive in bosnia?
Bosnjaks are bosnjaks always will be and always were (maybe under different name-Illyrians etc).
You contradict yourself here,
"always will be and always were, yet under a different name",hmmm makes real sense.
So bosniaks ( who were once known as the illyrians ) as you claim, are the aboriginals(native people) of the balkans, who never migrated but were always there....? If so, evidence.
The fact that we were ruled by different people …romans, avars-bulgars (Kotromans), serbs and croats, etc all the way to Austrians-Hungarians, Turks, Nazies-Fashists, Communists, now mostly chetniks and ustase does not make us them by any means.
Can you provide me with some evidence with the struggle, uprisings, civil disorder or wars, that the native bosniak people were subjected to while under the "rule" of the "foreign" Croatian and Serbian kings such as Tomislav or Mihailo?
As a matter of fact I am not mad to see that Croat's once had a part of Bosnia. (Not even true) BECAUSE CROAT'S WERE ONCE IRANIAN BROTHER'S! :lol:
http://www.iranchamber.com/culture/articles/croatians_cravats_iranian_origin.php
http://www.magma.ca/~rendic/conclusion.htm
Hmm... What you think my Croatian (Iranian) brother's!?
I will adress each part separatly, although i dont know what exactly you are trying to prove with this, however:
1.The province of Bosnia was much smaller, then what is today consider the borders of the province of Bosnia
Eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rastbosne.png
2.Yes the Kingdom of Croatia did under Tomislav(926 AD)rule over historical provinces (e.g., Hum, Vrhbosna, Podrinje, etc.) aswell as historical bosna i.e http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rastbosne.png, and even extend across what is even considered Todays Bosnia-Herzegovina, even across the river Drina.
3.Evidence, Tomislav was crowned in Duvno Field(Tomislavgrad) in todays Bosnia-Herzegovina.
4. Yes some sources suggest Croats originated from Persia(Iran) and
5. From your two links you added, it states croats arrived in the Balkans over 3000 years ago, so i dont know where you are going with this??
6.Unless you can provide me with eveidence that Bosniak tribe arrived even earlier then this date, or that the bosniaks have some sort of relation to the native inhabitants of the balkans, the illyrians inorder to justify your point.
7.If you posted those links inorder to prove that there is a distinction between Serbs and Croats, i thank you.
Croat's came from Iran and Bogomil's now who are Bosniak's were there before they came.
Again you shoot yourself in the foot, If as you claim Bosniaks were Bogomils(which in anycase is a religion not a people), as that was developed in 950's and Croats arrived in the balkans from iran in the 600's, and according to your sources, over 3000 years ago.
Again and again you contradict yourself, claiming to be Bogomils, then claiming to be Illyrians, then claiming to be Slavs.
So who are you trying to prove is wrong, my guess is you.
c3nar1us
03-23-2006, 12:41 PM
Warning
30 % FC sarajevo ( Political threads are allowed only AFS section)
30 % boris4c ( Posting about politcs outside AFS)
30 % Panathinaikos2 ( Signature violation )
And thread closed
vBulletin® v3.7.0 Beta 3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.