Debt | Loans | Debt Help | Power Rangers | Web Advertising
Is Slobodan Milosevic guilty of war crimes. [Archive] - Soccer Fans Network Forums

View Full Version : Is Slobodan Milosevic guilty of war crimes.


kezman008
09-25-2005, 04:32 AM
What do u think. Ill start first.



Of course not. He was just defending his country of terrorists and intruders.

Milos_
09-25-2005, 04:35 AM
stop :sad:

Ravna Gora
09-25-2005, 05:24 AM
As much as i hate him for his Communist and Yugoslav ways, i think he is not guilty, and that is the reason that they cannot successfully bring him to trial, using normal international law..

Mak
09-25-2005, 05:36 AM
I don't like him but he is not guilty. Desite all the charges laid against him, he has yet to be found guilty of any of them, 2-3 years later. According to reports from the Hague, he has embarassed the prosecutors. The Hague has even gone as low as suggesting he should not be allowed to defend himself, which is criminal on their part. I have wrote a lot more about this in the anger forum thead about war criminals.

davor_suker
09-25-2005, 06:33 AM
If by defending his country you mean invading other countries then youre correct.

Of course hes guilty, some of you obviously havent seen any of the atrocities commited during the war.

boban_10
09-25-2005, 06:51 AM
Of course he is

Mirko Mandic
09-25-2005, 07:11 AM
Slobo je sto posto ne kriv.........


I Cetniki i Ustase su najbolji Drugovi.... i plus dobri ljudi.....

Mak
09-25-2005, 07:33 AM
If by defending his country you mean invading other countries then youre correct.

Of course hes guilty, some of you obviously havent seen any of the atrocities commited during the war.

If it was as obvious as you make it out to be then Milosevic would have been found guilty by the Hague and put in jail. Clearly they are having a very difficult time finding him guilty. Remember that the Hague only became interested in Milosevic after what happened in Kosovo. Meaning he was not considered a war criminal by them for what happened in Bosnia and Croatia (as a matter of fact, he was praised by Western politicans and media during that time).

Regardless, I still find a court that has not and does not plan to try any US or NATO general highly suspicious. The fact that they are trying to prevent a man from defending himself justifies my position.

davor_suker
09-25-2005, 07:46 AM
If it was as obvious as you make it out to be then Milosevic would have been found guilty by the Hague and put in jail. Clearly they are having a very difficult time finding him guilty. Remember that the Hague only became interested in Milosevic after what happened in Kosovo. Meaning he was not considered a war criminal by them for what happened in Bosnia and Croatia (as a matter of fact, he was praised by Western politicans and media during that time).

Regardless, I still find a court that has not and does not plan to try any US or NATO general highly suspicious. The fact that they are trying to prevent a man from defending himself justifies my position.

Milosevic was in power for so long, these things take time.

Who the hell praised Slobodan for attacking neighbouring countries for no reason?

No Americans are tried because The USA isnt a party to the International court. America has its own justice system. The officers involved in Abu Ghraib
were sent to prison.

What do you mean theyre stopping him from defending himself?

boban_10
09-25-2005, 08:02 AM
If it was as obvious as you make it out to be then Milosevic would have been found guilty by the Hague and put in jail. Clearly they are having a very difficult time finding him guilty. Remember that the Hague only became interested in Milosevic after what happened in Kosovo. Meaning he was not considered a war criminal by them for what happened in Bosnia and Croatia (as a matter of fact, he was praised by Western politicans and media during that time).


But western countries don't give a damn about what he did.Becasue they are bastards. He could have destroyed the 'whole' of croatia, and they wouldnt find him guilty.
Yet they are demanding that Croatia hand in Gotovina and other Croat generals, for defending their homeland against people like Milosevic.

PAO_HELLAS
09-25-2005, 09:24 AM
As much as i hate him for his Communist and Yugoslav ways, i think he is not guilty, and that is the reason that they cannot successfully bring him to trial, using normal international law..

I agree with you.

Mirko Mandic
09-25-2005, 09:35 AM
i think ordering Genocide is a WAR CRIME and a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.

EASports
09-25-2005, 01:54 PM
UefaPooter why do you start such stupid threads ???????????? :boo: :mad2: :mad2: :red-card: :smash:

kezman008
09-25-2005, 04:01 PM
How can Milosevic be guilty. First of all the trial is taking over tow or three years. Second of all they have no evidence against him. How wcan he be guilty from defending his country against invaders and terrorists.

Toke-E-Yo
09-25-2005, 04:11 PM
wouldnt that make George Bush Guilty of war crimes to then? there must be somehting more than all this "invader and terrorist" stuff

Bosnian Unit
09-25-2005, 06:34 PM
wouldnt that make George Bush Guilty of war crimes to then? there must be somehting more than all this "invader and terrorist" stuff


of course man, but since america is greatest there is nobady who can judge them, except god...katrina,rita etc.. :lol:

yea but slobodan milosevic is quilty. some1 said he was just defending his country...attacking bosnia,croatia and kosovo is not defending his country :boo: .

Milos_
09-25-2005, 08:32 PM
attacking kosovo? kosovo is part of serbia it has allways been and it will allways be....

slobo is probably guilty but the hague are having a very hard time trying to prove that...

Bosnian Unit
09-25-2005, 10:18 PM
attacking kosovo? kosovo is part of serbia it has allways been and it will allways be....

slobo is probably guilty but the hague are having a very hard time trying to prove that...


i don't know man, looks like kosovo will be independent.albanians r majority and they will get what they want, i don't think anybody can stop them.

plus they have full support from america.

Milos_
09-25-2005, 10:26 PM
i don't know man, looks like kosovo will be independent.albanians r majority and they will get what they want, i don't think anybody can stop them.

plus they have full support from america.
only reason they have a 90% majority is because most of the serbs were forced to leave after nato came.

they had support but then they went on a serb killing and church burning frenzy now the support is slowly turning to serbias favour

serbia:handing over war criminals,referandoms,steadily improving economy

albanians:letting terrorists run wild,burning churches and monesteries,killing serbs...drugs,prostitutes,mafia...

kezman008
09-25-2005, 11:28 PM
thats right man.

A3eMurderer
09-26-2005, 02:48 AM
i don't know man, looks like kosovo will be independent.albanians r majority and they will get what they want, i don't think anybody can stop them.

plus they have full support from america.


I'm not too keen on the situations taking place in Kosovo. But since it's mentioned every day in this forum I took a small interest and looked at a little of background information (other than the obvious)... Now, from what I see it appears that it is within the boundaries of serbia and montenegro, but has a 90% albanian population. You are using this fact as means of advocating independence. That doesn't make too much sense to me at all, in fact, it sounds like rediculous. Chinatown in NY is 100% chinese, so what? should be make it an indepedent state? A bunch of large portions of many countries, especially the US are occupied by foregin ethnicities. So what? does that mean they have the right to even suggest independence?

kezman008
09-26-2005, 03:46 AM
no but u can not just go into someones country and start a war, and then want indipendence because you have a higher population in that part of the country.

Ravna Gora
09-26-2005, 12:00 PM
If Milosevic was guilty he would have been found guilty by now, he did not attack other countries due to the following:
- When war broke out in the Croatian province, Croatia was STILL A PART OF YUGOSLAVIA.
- Same as the above for Bosnia.
- Kosovo was not attacked, but defended, as it has been and always will be Serbian land, even the name of the province is Serbian, Kosovo named after the bird Kos (Magpie in English), there is no word in the Albanian language for it, rather the changed slang version, Kosova, therefore, KOSOVO IS SERBIA.

The above does not justify any horrible things that happened before, however i am very happy that Yugoslavia is split and we can all live on our own now...

p.s uefaplayer, please for the love of god take away that disgusting petokraka from the Serbian flag, u r embarrassing our nationality and what we stand for.

davor_suker
09-26-2005, 12:04 PM
If Milosevic was guilty he would have been found guilty by now, he did not attack other countries due to the following:
- When war broke out in the Croatian province, Croatia was STILL A PART OF YUGOSLAVIA.
- Same as the above for Bosnia.
- Kosovo was not attacked, but defended, as it has been and always will be Serbian land, even the name of the province is Serbian, Kosovo named after the bird Kos (Magpie in English), there is no word in the Albanian language for it, rather the changed slang version, Kosova, therefore, KOSOVO IS SERBIA.

The above does not justify any horrible things that happened before, however i am very happy that Yugoslavia is split and we can all live on our own now...

p.s uefaplayer, please for the love of god take away that disgusting petokraka from the Serbian flag, u r embarrassing our nationality and what we stand for.

If he was innocent, Serbia wouldnt have handed him over to the Hague.

Ravna Gora
09-26-2005, 12:11 PM
Srbija handed him over to the hague only to relieve itself of the sanctions from other nations as well as to have a better chance to enter the EU, that is a problem with most Serbs, its easier to put us against one another, than to unite us against some1 else, a bad error that wil l and has cost us too much

Bosnian Unit
09-26-2005, 04:07 PM
I'm not too keen on the situations taking place in Kosovo. But since it's mentioned every day in this forum I took a small interest and looked at a little of background information (other than the obvious)... Now, from what I see it appears that it is within the boundaries of serbia and montenegro, but has a 90% albanian population. You are using this fact as means of advocating independence. That doesn't make too much sense to me at all, in fact, it sounds like rediculous. Chinatown in NY is 100% chinese, so what? should be make it an indepedent state? A bunch of large portions of many countries, especially the US are occupied by foregin ethnicities. So what? does that mean they have the right to even suggest independence?

i understand that,just like france in the future will have even 10-15 million muslims but they r not gonna have some state on their own there. but in the balkans is diferent. weak serbia is in interest of the west, ask any serb they will tell you. ask them on wich side nato was when war happend in kosovo. im not saying who have right who don't thats just the way it's gonna be. and it might surprise you but in the future we may have in balkans states like luxemburg or andorra.i mean states size as these two r, becouse nothing is over, right here.everybody wants something, i dont agree with that becouse this part of europe should look towards future, nobady want ***king war no more but sometimes it seems this is never gonna end.

Mak
09-26-2005, 09:31 PM
i understand that,just like france in the future will have even 10-15 million muslims but they r not gonna have some state on their own there. but in the balkans is diferent. weak serbia is in interest of the west, ask any serb they will tell you. ask them on wich side nato was when war happend in kosovo. im not saying who have right who don't thats just the way it's gonna be. and it might surprise you but in the future we may have in balkans states like luxemburg or andorra.i mean states size as these two r, becouse nothing is over, right here.everybody wants something, i dont agree with that becouse this part of europe should look towards future, nobady want ***king war no more but sometimes it seems this is never gonna end.

The maps of the Balkans will be constantly changing (some countries getting bigger and others smaller). This will continue for a very long time as our history has always been dominated by war, much of it brought by foreign contries and others caused by ourselves.

ItalianBoy
09-26-2005, 09:33 PM
Only a moron like uefaplayer could have started this...

I think he does them on purpose.

purger
09-26-2005, 10:12 PM
When war broke out in the Croatian province, Croatia was STILL A PART OF YUGOSLAVIA.

Croatia was NOT a province, expecially not serbian province. Although Serbs felt that way and have done everything they could done to control it. In Croatia, 12% of population were Serbs and were in control of everything that was of importance to them.

Tijana
09-27-2005, 02:10 AM
Yes..he's guilty! hate that guy!

Flip
09-27-2005, 02:29 AM
He's guilty, I dunno how someone can deny what he has done.

Oh one of the good reasons why the trial has taken soo long to do. It's because Mr. Milosevic kept on getting very sick was not able to show up to some of the trials. The Brittish judge who was appointed, died. So it took more time to find a new one to be appointed, eventually it was a scotsman and much more.

Ravna Gora
09-27-2005, 04:20 AM
One of the facts that can show the stupidity of the trial of Slobodan Milosevic is that he has more witnesses than the proscecution, its just in the interest of the west to blame someone and he was the most appropriate at the time, as much as i would love to see him imprisoned, they need to find the right reason to do so..