FIFA WORLD RANKING is outrage

[SERBKINGKEZMAN]

FIFA World Rankings February 2005 FIFA World Rankings
--

Brazil, France and Argentina are still the top three teams this month. SERBIAare in 46 position which is crazy we are better than that. Barely any change in the top 10 this month, with just Mexico moving level with The Netherlands. Greece are the big movers up to 13th.

1 Brazil
2 France
3 Argentina
4 Czech Republic
5 Spain
6 Mexico
6 Netherlands
8 England
9 Portugal
10 Italy

11 USA
12 Republic of Ireland
13 Greece
13 Sweden
15Denmark
16 Turkey
17 Germany
18 Japan
18 Uruguay
20 Iran

21 Korea Republic
21 Nigeria
23 Cameroon
23 Croatia
25 Poland
26 Colombia
27 Costa Rica
28 Romania
29 Paraguay
30 Saudi Arabia

31 Senegal
32 Egypt
32 Russia
34 Morocco
35 Norway
36 Tunisia
37 Ecuador
38 Finland
39 Bulgaria
40 South Africa 41 Ivory Coast
41 Jordan
43 Slovenia
44 Iraq
44 Belgium
46 Jamaica
46 Serbia and Montenegro
48 Uzbekistan
48 Ukraine

[PartizanBeograd]

FIFA World Rankings February 2005 FIFA World Rankings
--

Brazil, France and Argentina are still the top three teams this month. SERBIAare in 46 position which is crazy we are better than that. Barely any change in the top 10 this month, with just Mexico moving level with The Netherlands. Greece are the big movers up to 13th.

1 Brazil
2 France
3 Argentina
4 Czech Republic
5 Spain
6 Mexico
6 Netherlands
8 England
9 Portugal
10 Italy

11 USA
12 Republic of Ireland
13 Greece
13 Sweden
15Denmark
16 Turkey
17 Germany
18 Japan
18 Uruguay
20 Iran

21 Korea Republic
21 Nigeria
23 Cameroon
23 Croatia
25 Poland
26 Colombia
27 Costa Rica
28 Romania
29 Paraguay
30 Saudi Arabia

31 Senegal
32 Egypt
32 Russia
34 Morocco
35 Norway
36 Tunisia
37 Ecuador
38 Finland
39 Bulgaria
40 South Africa 41 Ivory Coast
41 Jordan
43 Slovenia
44 Iraq
44 Belgium
46 Jamaica
46 Serbia and Montenegro
48 Uzbekistan
48 Ukraine

We are definatly better than this. But France i think should not even be in the top 20, they are horrible now. And once the world cup qualifying/ world cup finish, the new rankings will tell a differeent story.

[Marko_c]

rankings are based on a teams consistancy......if u consistantly win no matter hu u play u will go up........even if u play shitty teams, this is why mexico and usa are up so high

[SERBKINGKEZMAN]

rankings are based on a teams consistancy......if u consistantly win no matter hu u play u will go up........even if u play shitty teams, this is why mexico and usa are up so high
GOOD POINT SO WE NEED TO GET CONSITENT

[Marko_c]

yup yup

[SERBKINGKEZMAN]

Plaese Would You Vote For Bst Person For Job

[PartizanBeograd]

lately we have played alot of friendly second class teams, but we always tie
and that is why we fell in rankings. And also the losses with savicevic the worst loss being agsint Azerbaijgan

[nooo idiot!]

Dude, i wish u would STFU. U just dont understand the whole concept in the FIFA rankings. If SCG would qualify then they wouldnt have any problems being at the top of the ranking. Its not a at the moment thing, it actually takes results dating 8 years back into consideration....with respectful ponderation. This is a very curtious thing to do. U need to look at the whole purpose of the ranking...(to fairlly determine groops in qualifications). So u dont need to fuss about the concaf teams, rather look at the european zone ranking. Its no rocket science....if u want to be up high in the rankings....just win.....when u dont....STFU and stop complaining.
Note; Friendlies (X 1.00) dont give out as much points as QUALIFICATION MATCHES (X1.50) and TOURNAMENT MATCHES( 1.75 for continental cup and 2.00 for world cup (i think)). So its easy to see why SCG are 46. AND dont start saying its bull rules and its biased....because the rules are the same for EVERYONE....and consistent winners find themselves at the top. SIMPLE...

[Marko_c]

Dude, i wish u would STFU. U just dont understand the whole concept in the FIFA rankings. If SCG would qualify then they wouldnt have any problems being at the top of the ranking. Its not a at the moment thing, it actually takes results dating 8 years back into consideration....with respectful ponderation. This is a very curtious thing to do. U need to look at the whole purpose of the ranking...(to fairlly determine groops in qualifications). So u dont need to fuss about the concaf teams, rather look at the european zone ranking. Its no rocket science....if u want to be up high in the rankings....just win.....when u dont....STFU and stop complaining.
Note; Friendlies (X 1.00) dont give out as much points as QUALIFICATION MATCHES (X1.50) and TOURNAMENT MATCHES( 1.75 for continental cup and 2.00 for world cup (i think)). So its easy to see why SCG are 46. AND dont start saying its bull rules and its biased....because the rules are the same for EVERYONE....and consistent winners find themselves at the top. SIMPLE...


THANK U for explaining to these ignorant ppl how it works..... serbia is right where they should be give of take a few pts... at the moment, there nothing wrong with the fifa rankings